Confronting corruption for sustainable water and sanitation
To achieve SDG 6, tripling investments and improving governance are essential. In practice, this is not so straightforward. Corruption remains a major, overlooked barrier to progress, driving inefficiency and inequity in water and sanitation services.
This Water Integrity Global Outlook (WIGO 3) shines a light on these pervasive challenges across the budget cycle. The report offers practical solutions to ensure that investments are well managed and effectively lead to sustainable and equitable outcomes. A must-read for water sector professionals, decision-makers, and funders dedicated to driving real change.
Download
Water Integrity Global Outlook 3: Improving Integrity for Water and Sanitation Finance
Find out: Where is the money? What integrity risks threaten it? How do we use existing funds better? How do we improve integrity in water and sanitation organisations and utilities? What role for civil society and regulators in ensuring accountability?
New! Regional analysis
Water Integrity Global Outlook: Finance - Latin America
What can utilities do to control integrity risks in service delivery in low-income areas?
To ensure rural water supply, how can we improve the relationships between local stakeholders like municipalities and water committees? How do we strengthen accountability in new management and financial models for service provision, especially when decision-making is decentralised?
Latest insight on water and sanitation finance
Formación a medida
-
Addressing corruption and integrity failures in water and sanitation financing is critical to ensuring the efficient use of available funds—and the improvement of service delivery.
The cost of inaction on integrity is unacceptably high.
-
By far the greatest source of funding for water and sanitation is from water users, followed by government, although there are significant regional variations.
Someone always pays. The most poor often pay more.
-
Shrinking civic space and climate change are compounding the integrity challenges in water and sanitation finance.
-
Inadequate participation and limited civic infrastructure are skewing sector investment.
-
Climate change adds costs. Climate adaptation work does have new financing sources but integrity risks are high, especially in emergency situations.
-
-
Action for integrity is possible and effective at different levels - within projects, within organisations, as well as in local and national financial management systems.
-
There are integrity risks across the budget cycle.
In response, focusing on procurement risks is important, but insufficient.
Project and infrastructure planning, as well as tariff design need more attention.
Better internal management of service providers, including for non-revenue water programmes and financial management, is also key.
-
Effective integrity action combines three pathways for change. Digital innovation can boost all three of these pathways.
-
Ensuring there is 'no reason' and no rationalisation of corrupt behaviour,
-
Putting in place processes and oversight to leave 'no room' for corrupt acts, and
-
Detecting and sanctioning corruption so there can be 'no reprieve'.
-
-
Starting today, there are three major opportunities for change:
-
Strengthening public financial management;
-
Enabling stakeholder engagement in water and sanitation; and
-
Promoting a culture of integrity for water and sanitation.
-
-
There is expertise and support available from oversight institutions, as well as open government and anti-corruption organisations. Making sure the water and sanitation sectors builds links with these organisations is vital.
-
All water and sanitation stakeholders have a role to play - decision-makers, utilities and service providers, regulators, funders, and civil society.
By addressing corruption and integrity challenges head-on, with honesty and collaboration, we can ensure investments in water and sanitation lead to sustainable, equitable outcomes for all.